Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory

  • Intergroup contact typically reduces intergroup prejudice.
  • Results suggest that contact theory, devised originally from racial and ethnic encounters can be extended to other groups.
  • With random effects analysis, the 515 studies, 713 samples and 1,383 tests yield means rs that range from -.205 to -.214.
  • The meta-analysis reveals that greater intergroup contact is generally associated with lower levels of prejudice (mean=r=-.215).
  • 94% of the samples in our analysis show an inverse relationship between intergroup contact and prejudice.
  • Not only do attitudes toward the immediate participants usually become more favorable, but so do attitudes toward the entire out-group, outgroup members in other situations, and even outgroups not involved in the contact.
  • Results provide substantial evidence that intergroup contact can contribute meaningfully to reductions in prejudice across a broad range of groups and contexts.
  • Consistent with Allport’s original contentions, authors believe that optimal conditions for contact are best conceptualized as functioning together to facilitate positive intergroup outcomes rather than as entirely separate factors.
  • Reducing negative feelings such as anxiety and threat represents an important means by which intergroup contact diminishes prejudice.
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In