Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

Coleman Revisited: School Segregation, Peers, and Frog Ponds

  • Students from minority-concentrated schools attain less education in the long run that students from White-concentrated schools, controlling for many prior differences among students.
  • Frog pond processes offset normative ones, so peer effects cannot explain why minority-concentrated schools yield lower attainment.
  • In terms of normative processes, students in minority-concentrated schools tend to have more low-attaining friends and low-achieving schoolmates.
  • Schools with many Black and Latino students have frog-pond effects on students course work and especially their class rank; these students take more of the most selective courses in the school than similar students in White-concentrated schools. They also obtain a lower class ranking than similar students in White-concentrated schools, and this improves students long-term educational attainment.
  • Theories of minority concentrations in schools must go beyond explanations based on peer effects, because by themselves, they cannot explain why students from minority-concentrated schools attain less education.
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In