Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2011 - Coleman Revisited: School Segregation, Peers, and Frog Ponds

Attribution: Goldsmith, Pat Rubio
Researchers: Pat Rubio Goldsmith
University Affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Email: goldsmit@uwm.edu
Research Question:
Investigates whether peer effects are the reason that students from minority-concentrated schools attain less education than students from white-concentrated schools.
Published: 1
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: American Educational Research Journal
Journal Entry: Vol. 48, No. 3, Pp. 508-535
Year: 2011
Findings:
  • Students from minority-concentrated schools attain less education in the long run that students from White-concentrated schools, controlling for many prior differences among students.
  • Frog pond processes offset normative ones, so peer effects cannot explain why minority-concentrated schools yield lower attainment.
  • In terms of normative processes, students in minority-concentrated schools tend to have more low-attaining friends and low-achieving schoolmates.
  • Schools with many Black and Latino students have frog-pond effects on students course work and especially their class rank; these students take more of the most selective courses in the school than similar students in White-concentrated schools. They also obtain a lower class ranking than similar students in White-concentrated schools, and this improves students long-term educational attainment.
  • Theories of minority concentrations in schools must go beyond explanations based on peer effects, because by themselves, they cannot explain why students from minority-concentrated schools attain less education.
Keywords: African AmericanFrog Pond PerspectiveHispanicsPeer EffectsRacial CompositionRegions: NationalMethodologies: QuantitativeAnalysis Methods: Multinomial Logistic Regression Sampling Frame:Former students in US schools at age 26
Sampling Types: RandomData Types: Quantitative-Panel Data
Data Description:
  • Data come from the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS) 1988 cohort, which was supplemented with geographic information from the 1990 census.
  • Sample contains 10,827 students.
  • DV: educational attainment at age 26
  • IV: school composition (schools mean achievement, schools mean SES, schools proportion of students from single-parent families), peer behavior (friends do not emphasize attainment, unsafe at school, peers create school problems, peer influences on dropping out, and students place a high priority on learning), frog pond effects (students optimism, students percentile class rank, and students track/course level).
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In