Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2017 - Differences in Mathematics and Science Achievement by Grade 5 and Grade 8 Student Economic Status: A Multiyear, Statewide Study

Attribution: Anderson, Pamela Bennett; Moore, George W.; Slate, John R.
Researchers: George W. MooreJohn R. SlatePamela Bennett Anderson
University Affiliation: Sam Houston State University
Email:
Research Question:
What is the difference in Grade 5, 8 STAAR Mathematics and Science test performance as a function of student economic status?
Published: Yes
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Global Journal of HUMAN-SOCIAL SCIENCE: H
Journal Entry: Vol. 17, No. 5
Year: 2017
Findings:

– There were moderate effect sizes (Cohen’s d) each year of the study for the Grade 5 STAAR Mathematics scores, Grade 5 STAAR Science scores, Grade 8 STAAR Science scores, and the 2014-2015 Grade 8 exams STAAR Mathematics scores.
– For all years, Grade 5 students in poverty had an average STAAR Mathematics test score that was 6-7 points lower than their peers who were not economically disadvantaged.
– For all years, Grade 5 students in poverty had an average STAAR Science test score that was about 5 points lower than their peers who were not economically disadvantaged.
– For all years, Grade 8 students in poverty had an average STAAR Math test score that was between 5-8 points lower than their peers who were not economically disadvantaged.
– For all years, Grade 8 students in poverty had an average STAAR Science test score that was 6-7 points lower than their peers who were not economically disadvantaged.
– Students who were economically disadvantaged as well as students who were not poor had improved test performance from the 2011-2012 through the 2013-2014 school years.

Scholarship Types: Journal Article Reporting Empirical ResearchKeywords: Academic AchievementAchievement GapElementary SchoolMathMiddle SchoolPovertyScienceSocioeconomic StatusRegions: SouthMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: Administrative DataAnalysis Methods: Parametirc independent sample t-tests Sampling Frame:Grade 5 and Grade 8 students enrolled in Texas public schools
Sampling Types: Non-Random - PurposiveAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Quantitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:

For this study an ex-post facto, non-experimental, causal-comparative research design was used (Creswell, 2009).

Archived datasets for the spring STAAR Mathematics and Sciences tests from the Texas Education Agency for the 2011-2012 through the 2014-2015 school years were obtained and examined.

DV: STAAR Mathematics and Science test scores for Grade 5 students and Grade 8 students for each of the 2011-2012 through the 2014-2015 school years.

IV: Student economic status (disadvantaged refers to student status based on eligibility for free or reduced-price lunches as outlined in the National School Lunch program).

Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:Factors Related to STEM Readiness
Archives: K-16 STEM Abstracts

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to toolbar
  • Log In