Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2016 - Do They Stay or Do They Go? The Switching Decisions of Individuals Who Enter Gender Atypical College Majors

Attribution: Riegle-Crumb, Catherine, King, Barbara, & Moore, Chelsea
Researchers: Barbara KingCatherine Riegle-CrumbChelsea Moore
University Affiliation: University of Texas at Austin; Florida International University; University of Massachusetts at Amherst
Email: riegle@austin.utexas.edu
Research Question:
The authors explore whether women who enter fields that are male-dominated are more likely to switch fields than their female peers who have chosen other fields, as well as whether men who enter female-dominated majors are more likely to subsequently switch fields than their male peers who have chosen a more normative field.
Published: Yes
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Sex Roles
Journal Entry: Vol. 74, No. 9, Pp. 436-449
Year: 2016
Findings:
  1. Men who enter a female-dominated major are significantly more likely to switch majors than their male peers in other majors. By contrast, women in male-dominated fields are not more likely to switch fields compared to their female peers in other fields.
  2. It’s important to note that a smaller percentage of women enter male-dominated college majors than the reverse, perhaps indicating that the processes that deter women from considering gender-atypical fields occur more powerfully at earlier ages.
  3. Male students with families that have more education and more income were significantly less likely to declare a female-dominated major; however for women there was a positive and statistically significant correlation between parent education and entering a male-dominated major.
  4. Women with higher SAT scores were actually more likely to enter a field dominated by the other gender.
  5. When looking at overall switching patterns, among men, compared to the non-Hispanic White students, Black students had statistically significantly higher switching rates. Among women, Hispanic students had significantly higher switching rates than non-Hispanic White students. Regarding family social class background, among male students only, switchers came from families with significantly lower education and income levels.
  6. It is likely that men who enter female-dominated majors must face negative social sanctions from their peers, particularly other men, and that adult mentors and family members may encourage them to switch to fields with more status and income by telling them that they can do better.
  7. Perhaps the jobs linked to male-dominated majors have relatively higher labor market returns, women in these majors have an additional incentive to stay even in the midst of the many obstacles.
Scholarship Types: Journal Article Reporting Empirical ResearchKeywords: Academic SpecializationCollegeGenderIdentitySegregationSTEMStereotypeRegions: NationalMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: Secondary Survey DataAnalysis Methods: Descriptive StatisticsLogistic Regression Sampling Frame:College Students
Sampling Types: Nationally RepresentativeAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Quantitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:
  • The authors utilize theories of chilly climate and stereotype threat which suggest that women in male-dominated fields confront distinct obstacles not faced by their female peers in more typical fields. Additionally, theories of gender devaluation suggest that compared to their male peers who enter other fields, men in female-dominated fields face particularly strong deterrents from others to persist in their chosen field.
  • Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS 2004/09). This dataset includes information on U.S. students’ academic pathways in college. Respondents were interviewed at the end of their first year in college in 2004,with follow up surveys conducted in 2006 and 2009. Their analytic sample included 3,702 students who completed a degree at a 4-year, not for profit, degree-granting institution.
  • The DV was a dichotomous variable of a student’s decision to switch majors. This variable was constructed by using information about students’ initial choice of major from the baseline survey and comparing it to the major students report completing their degree in from later follow-up surveys. 44% of students switched from their original major.
  • The authors include measures of parents’ education and family incomes as proxies for social class. They also control for students’ race/ethnicity and measures of academic performance in both high school and college. Academic performance was measured by English and Math SAT scores, self-reported high school GPA, and student’s GPA’s in their first two years of college.
  • The authors’ key IV was gender composition of students’ major. To measure this, the authors used the following designation: a gender atypical major is defined as one that is male-dominated or female-dominated such that the composition is equal to or greater than 70 % of a particular gender. Female-dominated fields included English, education, psychology, public administration and social service, foreign language, health, sociology and other social sciences, and family sciences. Male-dominated fields included engineering, computer science, and economics.
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:STEM Persistence and Retention
Archives: K-16 STEM Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In