Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

Does Segregation Still Matter? The Impact of Student Composition on Academic Achievement in High School

  • Segregation still matters but it is the socioeconomic composition not the racial composition of high schools that impacts student achievement.
  • Effects of socioeconomic segregation can be largely explained by its association with such school characteristics as academic climate and teacher expectations.
  • What matters the most is the socioeconomic, not the racial, composition of schools.
  • A number of structural features of high schools, such as school size and sector, predict achievement growth, although none of the resource variables had a significant effect.
  • Schools influenced the achievement of students from all backgrounds.
  • Results suggest that the reason school SES matters is that it is related to a number of school processes that predict achievement growth.
  • School policies and practices (teacher expectation and academic climate ) did account for the effect of school SES.
  • Desegregation may not be necessary if it were possible to alter those policies and practices that are associated with schools SES.
  • The average socioeconomic level of students’ schools had as much impact on their achievement growth as their own socioeconomic status, net of other background factors.
  • School socioeconomic status had as much impact on advantaged as on disadvantaged students, and almost as much impact on Whites as on Blacks.
  • Schools serving mostly lower-income students tend to be organized and operated differently than those serving more-affluent students, transcending other school-level differences such as public or private, large or small.
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In