Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2007 - Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science

Attribution: Weisgram, Erica S., & Bigler, Rebecca S.
Researchers: Erica S. WeisgramRebecca S. Bigler
University Affiliation: University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point; University of Texas at Austin
Email: Erica.Weisgram@uwsp.edu
Research Question:
To examine whether adolescent girls' interest in, and attitudes toward, science are affected by knowledge about gender discrimination in the field.
Published: Yes
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Psychology of Women Quarterly
Journal Entry: Vol. 31, Pp. 262-269
Year: 2007
Findings:

– Only girls who learned about gender discrimination showed increases in science self-efficacy and belief in the value of science; interest in scientific fields was unaffected by the intervention programs.
– Although girls in the standard condition were exposed to female scientists (as were girls in the discrimination condition), the sessions led by these women did not explicitly address the underrepresentation of women in scientific careers or the rationale for targeting the EYH intervention at girls but not boys. This omission may have left girls in this condition believing that men are more adept at science than women.
– Exposure to the information about discrimination may have led girls to reinterpret past negative feedback, both about their group’s performance and their own performance in science.
– Highlighting the accomplishments of famous and important women in science may have emphasized the important and worthwhile discoveries of scientists in the field. However, the authors also believe that exposure to information about women who have struggled to become scientists and contributed to the field despite being the victims of gender discrimination served to increase girls’ own belief that science is an important and worthwhile subject of study.

 

Scholarship Types: Journal Article Reporting Empirical ResearchKeywords: AttitudesDiscriminationGenderInterestScienceRegions: UnknownMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: SurveyAnalysis Methods: Mixed-model ANOVA Sampling Frame:Middle School Girls in Intervention Program
Sampling Types: Non-random - opportunityAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Quantitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:

Participants were 158 middle-school-aged girls (79 European American, 38 Hispanic, 10 African American, 6 Asian American, 6 other ethnic origin, and 19 unreported) who elected to attend an intervention program aimed at increasing girls’ interest in science. Girls ranged in age from 11 to14 years.

Participants attended a 1-day conference entitled “Expanding Your Horizons” (EYH) aimed at increasing girls’ interest in science. As part of the conference programming, all girls attended four sessions led by female scientists in which they heard presentations about the presenters’ careers and participated in hands-on activities. Presenters included 24 female scientists recruited from local businesses, colleges, and universities. The vast majority of these presenters made multiple presentations.

Girls were randomly assigned to treatment conditions and intervention sessions. Thus, participant characteristics were similar across treatment conditions, and girls in the two conditions were exposed to approximately the same pool of presenters with the exception of the session on discrimination.

In the one treatment group, participants (n=62) attended three 1-hour sessions led by female scientists in which they heard presentations about the presenters’ careers and participated in hands-on science activities. In addition, participants attended a 1-hour session about common types of gender discrimination in scientific fields led by psychology graduate students who were trained in the manipulation and memorized a scripted lesson.

In the other treatment group, participants (n=96) attended four 1-hour sessions led by female scientists in which they heard presentations about the presenters’ careers and participated in hands-on science activities. They did not participate in a session on gender discrimination. The majority of the presenters made the same presentation multiple times, and thus, many of the girls in each treatment group attended the same sessions at various times throughout the program.

The participants filled out pre- and post-test surveys. To assess the degree to which girls perceived discrimination against women in general, participants completed the Contemporary Gender Discrimination Attitude Scale. Participants also completed survey questions that measured egalitarian attitudes toward science, (b) self-efficacy in science, and (c) utility value of science. These attitudes are considered “task-specific” because they are specific to the domain of science.

Participants reported their interest in science. Participants were asked to indicate their interest in 25 tasks performed in scientific domains. To determine whether girls perceived women to be underrepresented in the sciences, participants were asked to estimate the proportion of all scientists that are women. To assess participants’ specific reactions to learning about discrimination, girls in the discrimination (but not other group) condition completed a survey that included seven items assessing reactions to the lessons.

Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:STEM Interest/Pursuit/Aspirations/Intent
Archives: K-16 STEM Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In