Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2015 - Impacts of Intersection Between Social Capital and Finances on Community College Students’ Pursuit of STEM Degrees

Attribution: Kruse, Tracy, Starobin, Soko S., Chen, Yu, Baul, Tushi, & Laanan, Frankie S.
Researchers: Frankie S. LaananSoko S. StarobinTracy KruseTushi BaulYu Chen
University Affiliation: Northeast Community College; Iowa State University; New York University; Florida Atlantic University
Email: starobin@iastate.edu
Research Question:
1) How can the constructs of social/cultural capital and financial constraints be measured? 2) How do the intersection of social capital and financial constraints impact community college students' pursuit of STEM degrees through transfer? 3) Identify the factors related to social and cultural capital, finances, and external factors that pull students away from their studies.
Published: Yes
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Journal Entry: Vol. 39, No. 4, Pp. 324-343
Year: 2015
Findings:
  1. Parent involvement in high school is a significant predictor of transfer intentions.
  2. Parent education levels are a predictor of parent involvement in high schools. The more educated the parent, the more likely he or she is to be involved in school-related activities, help with their homework, and discuss students’ progress in school.
  3. Family encouragement is related to parent involvement in high school and has a mediated effect on transfer intentions through access to institutional agents such as community college advisers.
  4. Community college advising has the most significant effect on transfer than any other variable studied.
  5. Work-study positions on campus are a positive predictor of student persistence. Students working on campus were much more likely to have transfer intentions in STEM fields than those who were not.
  6. The impact of financial aid on transfer intentions is a small, but significant, negative effect. The more financial aid students receive, the less they are likely to have plans to transfer.
  7. Financial concerns and debt aversion are both significant predictors of transfer intentions.
  8. A strong direct effect on the transfer intention from social capital, and a smaller effect from family encouragement, work-study, and parent education.
  9. The final model identified social capital factors related to parental education levels, family encouragement, parent involvement in high school, and access to institutional agents.
  10. Debt aversion did play a role in the model, although not a part of social capital as originally hypothesized.
Keywords: Community College StudentsCultural CapitalDebt AversionFinancial CapitalPersistenceRetentionSocial CapitalSTEMTransferRegions: MidwestMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: Secondary Survey DataAnalysis Methods: Descriptive StatisticsFactor AnalysisStructural Equation Modeling Sampling Frame:Community College Students
Sampling Types: Non-RandomNonrandomSelf-selectedAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Quantitative-Cross Sectional
Data Description:
  • The data used was from the STEM Student Success Literacy (SSSL) survey. The sample size used consisted of 5,140 individuals that went to one of the 15 community colleges in Iowa for at least one semester.
  • 72% of the study sample were female and more than half of them were over the age of 24. However, men made up 38.9% of those in the sample that planned on transferring into a STEM field.
  • DV= intention to transfer into STEM major.
  • IV= measures of financial capital (financial aid), social capital (parent involvement in school, family encouragement) and cultural capital.
  • The authors utilized the following theories for their theoretical framework:
    • Cabrera, Nora, and Castaneda’s integrated model of student retention.
    • Hagedorn and colleagues system retention concept to understand the transfer behavior of community college students.
    • They also included Bourdieu’s Social Capital Theory and Nora’s Student/Institution Engagement Model.
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:Community College and STEM.
Archives: K-16 STEM Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In