Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2001 - Maximizing the Benefits of Student Diversity: Lessons from School Desegregation Research

Attribution: Schofield, Janet Ward
Researchers: Janet Ward Schofield
University Affiliation: University of Pittsburgh
Email: schof@pitt.edu
Research Question:
Summarizes research on effects of desegregation in elementary and secondary schools
Published: 1
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: N/A
Journal Entry: In G. Orfield. Diversity Challenged: Evidence of the Impact of Affirmative Action. 99-109
Year: 2001
Findings:
  • The research shows that desegregated elementary and secondary school generally improves academic achievement of African Americans and indicates some benefits for Hispanics. Increased suspension rates and decreased drop out rates for minorities are also associated outcomes. The studies show modest, positive long term occupational outcomes for African Americans. Desegregation also helps reduce racial isolation. There is less research on effects of desegregation for White students. The nature of desegregation is important for outcomes. The institutional approaches to desegregation are important. Four approaches are identified: business as usual, assimilation, pluralistic coexistence, and integrated pluralism. The first three can result in resegregation. Factors conducive to integrated pluralism: support of relevant authorities, cooperation toward mutual goals, and equal status for members of all groups.
Keywords: DesegregationDisciplineDiversityDropoutsIntegrationLong Term OutcomesOccupational OutcomesRegions: NationalMethodologies: QualitativeResearch Designs: Literature ReviewAnalysis Methods: Content Analysis Sampling Frame:Previous Studies
Sampling Types: NonrandomAnalysis Units: DocumentData Types: Qualitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:
  • Studies reviewed in this chapter include:
  • Allan (1988)
  • Bennet (1995)
  • Nettles (1988)
  • Schoem, Frankel, Zuniga, & Lewis (1993)
  • Stephan & Stephan (1985)
  • Sagar & Schofield (1984)
  • Pettigrew (1998)
  • Tatum (1995)
  • Slavin (1985), (1992), (1995)
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In