Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2010 - Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is it the School that Matters?

Attribution: Griffith, Amanda L.
Researchers: Amanda L. Griffith
University Affiliation: Wake Forest University
Email: griffial@wfu.edu
Research Question:
Which factors contribute to persistence of all students in STEM field majors, and in particular the persistence of women and minorities?
Published: Yes
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Economics of Education Review
Journal Entry: Vol. 29, Pp. 911-922
Year: 2010
Findings:
  1. Although descriptive statistics show that a smaller percentage of women and minorities persist in a STEM field major as compared to male and non-minority students, regression analysis shows that differences in preparation and the educational experiences of these students explains much of the differences in persistence rates.
  2. Students at selective institutions with a large graduate to undergraduate student ratio and that devote a significant amount of spending to research have lower rates of persistence in STEM fields.
  3. A higher percentage of female and minority STEM field graduate students positively impacts on the persistence of female and minority students.
  4. There is little evidence that having a larger percentage of STEM field faculty members that are female increases the likelihood of persistence for women in STEM major.
  5. The racial composition of the students in the department seems to have no significant effect on the persistence decisions of minority students.
  6. Students in all four groups are more likely to remain in a STEM field major as the ratio of their grades earned in STEM courses to grades earned in non-STEM courses increases.
  7. All four groups are more likely to remain in a STEM field major at institutions with more undergraduate relative to graduate students, as well as at institutions with no graduate programs at all.
  8. After controlling for background characteristics, female non-minority and all minority students are less likely to switch into STEM than male or minority students, respectively, in the NLSF sample, and all female students in the NELS:88 sample are less likely to switch.
Scholarship Types: Journal Article Reporting Empirical ResearchKeywords: CollegeEducational EconomicsExpendituresGenderMinoritiesSTEMRegions: NationalMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: Secondary Survey DataAnalysis Methods: Descriptive StatisticsLogit Regressions Sampling Frame:College Students
Sampling Types: Nationally RepresentativeAnalysis Units: CollegeStudentData Types: Quantitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:
  • National Longitudinal Survey of Freshmen (NLSF) and the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88). The NLSF first surveyed students entering 28 selective colleges and universities in the U.S.in the fall of 1999 and followed them through their senior year. The NELS:88 originally surveyed students in the eighth grade in 1988,with subsequent follow-ups in the 10th and 12th grades. Data on college characteristics are derived from the Integrated Post-Secondary Education Data System (IPEDS).
  • A measure of the gender and race composition of the student body is measured as the average of the percentage of STEM undergraduate majors and STEM graduate students that are female or minority students during the student’s first two years of college.
  • Due to data limitations, data from IPEDS in 1985, is used as a proxy for faculty gender composition for the NELS:88 sample.
  • The IV’s include: gender; being a minority; number of STEM AP classes taken; ratio of 1st year STEM GPA to all GPA; ratio undergraduate to graduate enrollment; having no graduate students; percentage of female faculty in STEM; percentage of female faculty in STEM compared to overall percentage of female faculty; proportion of research expenditures compared to educational expenditures by the university; percentage of STEM undergrads that are female compared to total female undergrads; percentage of STEM undergrads that are minority compared to total minority undergrads; percentage of STEM PHD students that are female; percentage of STEM PHD students that are minority.
  • The DV’s were persistence in STEM by their 2nd and 4th year and switching to STEM major by sophomore year.
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:STEM Persistence and Retention
Archives: K-16 STEM Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In