Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2016 - Racial/Ethnic Differences in Perceptions of School Climate and Its Association with Student Engagement and Peer Aggression

Attribution: Konold, Timothy, Cornell, Dewey, Shukla, Kathan & Huang, Francis
Researchers: Dewey CornellFrancis HuangKathan ShuklaTimothy Konold
University Affiliation: University of Virginia
Email: konold@virginia.edu
Research Question:
  • Do Black, Hispanic, and White students differ in their perceptions of school climate?
  • Do the associations between authoritative school climate and student engagement as well as peer aggression differ for Black, Hispanic, and White students?
Published: 1
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal Entry: DOI 10.1007/s10964-016-0576-1
Year: 2016
Findings:

– Perceptions of school climate differed between Black and White groups, but not between Hispanic and White groups.

-Race/ethnicity did not moderate the associations between school climate and either engagement or peer aggression.

  • Although correlational and cross-sectional in nature, these results are consistent with the conclusion that a positive school climate holds similar benefits of promoting student engagement and reducing victimization experiences across Black, Hispanic, and White groups.

  • All contrasts controlled for parent education level, student gender, the percentage of students in the school sharing the same race as the respondent, the percent of students in the respondents’ school receiving free- or reduced-prices meals, and school size.

  • Results indicated that White students reported higher levels of student support and disciplinary structure than Black students, while Black students reported higher academic expectations in comparison to White students. By contrast, White and Hispanic students reported similar levels of student support, disciplinary structure, and academic expectations.

  • A positive school climate characterized by high disciplinary structure, supportive teacher-student relationships, and high academic expectations for students was associated with higher levels of student engagement and lower levels of peer aggression.

  • White students reported statistically higher levels of support and disciplinary structure than Black students, while Black students reported significantly higher academic expectations.

  • Differences between Hispanic and White students were statistically indistinguishable across these measures of school climate.

  • Higher reported levels of student support and disciplinary structure were statistically associated with increases in student engagement and decreases in the reported prevalence of teasing and bullying, bullying victimization, and general victimization.

  • As percent of Free/Reduced Price Lunch increases, reports of bullying experiences also increases when comparing Black to White students.

  • As percent of Free/Reduced Price Lunch decreases, reports of bullying experiences also decrease, when comparing Hispanic to white students.

Keywords: RaceRacial CompositionMethodologies: QuantitativeAnalysis Methods: Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) Sampling Frame:Virginia Public High Schools
Sampling Types: PopulationAnalysis Units: SchoolStudentData Types: Quantitative-Cross Sectional
Data Description:
  • Study schools were obtained from the 2014 Virginia Secondary School Climate Survey, which is part of the state’s annual School Safety Audit program. The survey was administered to students in Virginia public schools with grades 9-12 (including some schools without a grade 9).

  • A total of 323 of 324 eligible schools participated in the survey.

  • Schools were given two options for sampling students: (1) invite all students in each grade to take the survey, with a goal of surveying at least 70 % of all eligible students; (2) randomly select at least 25 students from each grade to take the survey. Schools were given these options in order to provide administrators flexibility in choosing a more or less comprehensive assessment of their students.

  • Student surveys were administered anonymously online in classrooms under the supervisions of teachers or school staff members that followed a set of standardized instructions.

  • The complete online survey consisted of 100 items that measured the three authoritative school climate variables under investigation in the current study and the four student outcomes of interest.

  • Student Support- This 8-item scale was designed to measure the supportive- ness of teacher-student relationships with items such as how much students perceive that adults in their school “really care about all students” and whether they would seek help for problems such as bullying.

  • Disciplinary Structure – A seven-item scale was designed to measure the perceived fairness and strictness of school discipline with items such as “The school rules are fair” and “The school rules are strictly enforced.”

  • Academic Expectations- A 5-item scale measured student perceptions that their teachers expected high academic achievement from them.

  • Student Engagement- This measure contained six items derived in part from the Commitment to School scale (Thornberry et al. 1991). The scale taps both affective (e.g., “I am proud to be a student at this school”) and cognitive (e.g., “I want to learn as much as I can at school”) aspects of student engagement.

  • Peer victimization has 3 measures; Bullying victimization, General victimization, and prevalence of teasing and bullying.

  • Bullying Victimization was measured on a 5-item scale to assess personal experiences of being bullied at school this year. Each item had four response options (1 = never, 2 = once or twice, 3 = about once per week, and 4 = more than once per week).

  • The General Victimization scale consisted of five items asking about general victimization experiences at school this year. There were three response options (1 = no, 2 = one time, 3 = more than once).

  • Prevalence of Teasing and Bullying (PTB) is a 5-item scale that measured student observations of the prevalence of teasing and bullying among other students, as distinguished from personal victimization.

  • The school-level covariates of school size and percentage of students who were eligible for free- or reduced- price meals (% FRPM) were obtained from state Department of Education records. In addition, the percentage of students in a school that shared the same race/ethnicity as the participant was determined from school records.

Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In