Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2010 - School Composition and Contextual Effects on Student Outcomes

Attribution: Willms, J. Douglas
University Affiliation:
Email:
Research Question:
This study examines the relationships among school composition, several aspects of school and classroom context, and students’ literacy skills in science.
Published: TRUE
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation:
Journal Entry: Vol. 112, No. 4, pp. 1008-1037
Year: 2010
Findings:

– In every country, there is a significant relationship between science performance and SES.
– In many school systems, the inequality in schooling outcomes associated with SES is entrenched in the mechanisms through which students are allocated to schools, including residential segregation, private schooling, special programs in the public sector, and selective tracks that channel students into different schools based on their prior achievement or ability.
– An understanding of the nature of socioeconomic gradients and the role of school composition is central to discussions about educational quality, equality, and equity.
– The author proposes five types of interventions for raising and leveling the learning bar:
– – Performance-targeted interventions aim to improve the levels of schooling outcomes of students who have low performance in a particular domain.
– – SES-targeted interventions can entail the same kinds of interventions as performance-targeted interventions, except that they are directed toward children from low SES families.
– – Compensatory interventions provide additional economic resources to students from low SES families.
– – Universal interventions are targeted at all children in a jurisdiction. They strive to raise performance uniformly.
– – Inclusive interventions attempt to reduce horizontal segregation with policies that redistribute low SES students into mainstream schools.

Sampling Frame:15-year-old students in 57 countries
Data Description:

– In every country, there is a significant relationship between science performance and SES.
– In many school systems, the inequality in schooling outcomes associated with SES is entrenched in the mechanisms through which students are allocated to schools, including residential segregation, private schooling, special programs in the public sector, and selective tracks that channel students into different schools based on their prior achievement or ability.
– An understanding of the nature of socioeconomic gradients and the role of school composition is central to discussions about educational quality, equality, and equity.
– The author proposes five types of interventions for raising and leveling the learning bar:
– – Performance-targeted interventions aim to improve the levels of schooling outcomes of students who have low performance in a particular domain.
– – SES-targeted interventions can entail the same kinds of interventions as performance-targeted interventions, except that they are directed toward children from low SES families.
– – Compensatory interventions provide additional economic resources to students from low SES families.
– – Universal interventions are targeted at all children in a jurisdiction. They strive to raise performance uniformly.
– – Inclusive interventions attempt to reduce horizontal segregation with policies that redistribute low SES students into mainstream schools.

Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:0
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In