Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2006 - Segregation and the SAT

Attribution: Mickelson, Roslyn A.
Researchers: Roslyn A. Mickelson
University Affiliation: University of North Carolina Charlotte
Email: rmicklsn@uncc.edu
Research Question:
Analyzes how organizational features of school racial composition and tracks influence student's opportunities to learn material covered on the SAT.
Published: 1
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Ohio State Law Journal
Journal Entry: Vol. 67, No. 1
Year: 2006
Findings:
  • Both forms of segregation (first-generation and second-generation) negatively affects SAT scores.
  • Racially imbalanced High School tracks affect SAT scores.
  • High School track were one of the most important influences on SAT outcomes.
  • After controlling for difference in family background, gender, effort, peer group influences, and prior achievement, there was a relationship with student’s race and track placement. Blacks were more likely than otherwise similar Whites to be enrolled in lower tracks.
  • The more time students spent in segregated Black elementary schools, the less likely they were to be assigned to higher track classes in High School, all else being equal.
  • Black-White race gap in SAT scores reflects variations in opportunities to learn that are associated with the racial composition of schools and classrooms in which students learn.
  • School sponsored opportunities to prepare for the SAT that vary with a school’s racial composition were more subtle indicators of white privilege in CMS.
  • Students from higher socioeconomic backgrounds and those with cultural capital earn higher SAT scores.
  • Prior achievement, college-oriented peers, and optimistic attitudes about education’s role in one’s future all have positive effects on SAT scores.
  • Self-reported effort and abstract attitudes have no effect.
Keywords: Achievement GapDesegregationHigh SchoolRacial CompositionSATSegregationTrackingRegions: SouthMethodologies: MixedAnalysis Methods: Multilevel Models Sampling Frame:School District
Sampling Types: RandomAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Mixed-Longitudinal
Data Description:
  • Data from an eighteen-year (1987-2002) multimethod case study of educational reform in North Carolina’s Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District
  • High School Student Survey 1833 High School seniors surveyed in 1997.
  • CMS principal Survey Data in 1999.
  • Interviews with Principals: telephone interviewed with purposively selected principals.
  • Interviews with students, parents and educators. 160 students, their parents , teachers and counselors.
  • DV: SAT total battery score
  • IV: School-level segregation (the percentage of black students in the respondent’s high school and the percentage of the respondent’s elementary education that took place in segregated black schools; Classroomlevel segregation is operationalized using the track level of the respondent’s twelfth-grade English class), race, gender, family background, cultural capital, effort, prior achievement, % peers going to college, concrete attitudes, abstract attitudes, college track,
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In