Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2009 - The Impact of School Choice and Public Policy on Segregation: Evidence from Chile

Attribution: Elacqua, Gregory
Researchers: Gregory Elacqua
University Affiliation: Universidad Diego Portales
Email: gregory.elacqua@cpce.cl
Research Question:
Examines segregation between schools within a sector and variation within private voucher forprofit and non-profit (religious and secular) school sectors.
Published: 0
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: Centro de Politicas Comparadas de Educacion
Journal Entry: October
Year: 2009
Findings:
  • In the aggregate, private voucher schools serve fewer disadvantaged students than public schools. However, the results also indicate that this aggregate analysis masks some differences within the private voucher sector.
  • Indigenous students make up 8.1 percent of for-profit enrollments and only 6.4 percent of non-profit enrollments.
  • The proportion of indigenous students has increased across sectors, on average about 1.5 percent between 1999 and 2006.
  • The coefficient for public schools indicates that, on average, public schools serve 9 percentage points more high risk (vulnerable) students than private voucher schools after controlling for other school, local, and regional characteristics.
  • The differences between public and private voucher schools decline by over 7 percentage points after controlling for whether or not private voucher schools charge tuition.
  • Non-profit schools serve 3 percentage points fewer vulnerable students than for-profit voucher schools.
  • After controlling for tuition and other covariates, public school serve 2 percentage points fewer high risk students than for-profit voucher schools that belong to a network.
  • Private voucher schools serve more indigenous students than public schools.
  • Private voucher schools that charge tuition serve, all else equal, enroll 4 percentage points fewer indigenous students than schools that do not levy fees.
  • Indigenous students are more segregated from other non-indigenous students in private voucher schools than those in public schools.
  • Indigenous students are more integrated with other non-indigenous students in for-profit network schools than in public and other private voucher school sectors.
  • Among all schools, public schools have the most diverse enrollments and for-profit independent schools have the highest levels of segregation.
Keywords: ChoicePrivate SchoolsPublic SchoolsSegregationVouchersRegions: InternationalMethodologies: QuantitativeResearch Designs: Secondary DataAnalysis Methods: Regression Sampling Frame:Population
Sampling Types: PopulationAnalysis Units: StudentData Types: Quantitative-Panel Data
Data Description:
  • Panel dataset constructed from the administrative records of the Ministry of Education of Chile.
  • Two measures are used to compare the level of segregation between sectors:
  • 1. The vulnerability index (- IVE) constructed by the Junta Nacional de Auxilio Escolar y Becas (JUNAEB, National Scholarship and School Aid Board)JUNAEB estimates – IVE on the basis of the results of a parent survey about students’ background conducted by schools.
  • 2. Percentage of indigenous students enrolled across sectors, as measured by parent questionnaires collected by Chile’s national standardized test (Sistema de Medicion de la Calidad de la Educacion-SIMCE) which asks parents if the child’s mother identifies herself as indigenous.
  • DV: Number of disadvantaged students
  • IV: Public vs. private school, religious affiliation, percentage of indigenous and at-risk students in municipality, profit vs. non-profit status, rural vs. urban location, age of school, tuition
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In