Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

2011 - Why Racial Integration and Other Policies Since Brown v. Board of Education Have Only Partially Succeeded at Narrowing the Achievement Gap

Attribution: Ferguson, Ronald F., & Mehta, Jal
Researchers: Jal MehtaRonald F. Ferguson
University Affiliation: Harvard University
Email: ronald_ferguson@Harvard.Edu
Research Question:
Reviews previous literature to investigate why the achievement gap continues despite desegregation efforts.
Published: 1
Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation: National Academies Press
Journal Entry: Achieving High Educational Standards for All, pp. 183-208
Year: 2011
Findings:
  • Post-segregation education policies include forced integration , Title I, Head Start, and the basic skills movement.
  • Title I has demonstrated very limited positive impacts on achievement gaps.
  • Head Start has demonstrated somewhat positive impacts on achievement gaps, although a “fade out” occurs whereby the positive effect washes out over time.
  • An emphasis on basic skills has not been shown to help diminish the achievement gap.
  • Early research on the effects of desegregation overall showed little impact, while more recent research has shown significant increases in Black students’ reading achievement, as well as positive non-academic outcomes.
  • Concludes that it is not exposure to whites, per se, that creates these benefits for Black students, but their access to resources that are more prevalent in higher-proportion white schools.
  • Ability grouping and tracking are not categorically bad for certain groups of students.
  • Class size does seem to make a difference in terms of achievement, especially for minority students.
Keywords: Ability GroupsClass SizeDesegregationTrackingRegions: NationalMethodologies: QualitativeAnalysis Methods: Content Analysis Sampling Frame:Previous studies
Sampling Types: NonrandomAnalysis Units: DocumentData Types: Qualitative-Longitudinal
Data Description:
  • Studies reviewed include Jencks and Mayer (1990), Phillips (2001), Wells and Crain (1997), Rosenbaum (1995), Hanushek (1986, 1997)
Theoretical Framework:
Relevance:
Archives: K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Abstracts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In