Diversity in Education
Diversity in Education
  • Overview
  • K-12 Integration, Desegregation, and Segregation Archive
  • K-16 STEM Archive
  • Browse
    • By Method of Analysis
    • By Unit of Analysis
    • By Data Type
    • By Journal Name or Institutional Affiliation
    • By Keyword
    • By Methodology
    • By Region
    • By Research
    • By Scholarship
    • By Sample Type
  • Help
  • Contact Us

Filter

  • Sort by

  • Filtered Search Term

  • Archive

  • Keywords

  • Research Designs

  • Analysis Methods

  • Researchers

Pathways to STEMM Professions for Students From Noncollege Homes

  1. The children of non-college-educated parents were less likely to take algebra in Grade 8, take calculus in high school, and take calculus in college than were the children of college-educated parents.
  2. Students from college-educated households are twice as likely as students from noncollege households to score in the top quartile on standardized mathematics achievement tests.
  3. Students from college-educated households are also more than twice as likely to rank in the top tier of reading scores than are students from noncollege families.
  4. Each of these results reflects a combination of parental and school influences, and the differential is compounded by the tendency for children from college-educated families to attend better elementary and secondary schools than children from non-college-educated families.
  5. Young adults that grew up in noncollege families were less likely to enter postsecondary education; more likely to begin postsecondary education at a community college; less likely to earn a baccalaureate, graduate, or professional degree; and less likely to become a STEMM professional.
  6. The modest differences in parent encouragement between college-educated households and non-college-educated households did not translate into significant differences in students’ attitudes toward math and science.
  7. Young adults from college educated families are 3 times more likely to have found employment as a STEMM professional than young adults from noncollege homes.
  8. There were no major structural differences in the pathways to a STEMM profession. All of the variables that were significant contributors for students from college-educated homes were also significant contributors for students from non-college-educated homes.
  9. The analysis reveals a clear pattern of cumulative advantage and cumulative disadvantage.
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In